KQQQ vs. GPIQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

KQQQ (Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KQQQ is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Kurv, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KQQQ returned 25.10% vs 25.84% for GPIQ. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KQQQ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KQQQ having a 12.96% return and GPIQ slightly higher at 13.18%.

KQQQ

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -1.24%
• 6M: 11.84%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 1Y: 25.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.87%

GPIQ

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 10.62%
• YTD: 13.18%
• 1Y: 25.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	$89.39M	$82.61M	$83.97M
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	$1.35M	$1.22M	$1.55M

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	12.96%	16.64%	11.50%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	13.18%	19.77%	7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and GPIQ is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.94

The correlation between KQQQ and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KQQQ	GPIQ
Technology	52.7%	60.7%
Communication Services	27.5%	11.8%
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	10.1%
Industrials	2.8%	4.2%
Financial Services	1.3%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.1%	3.7%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 46
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KQQQ	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.56	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	2.15	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.28	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	2.73	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	9.62	-5.23

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KQQQ and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	KQQQ	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-21.06%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	-9.51%	-7.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-4.62%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-2.34%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.72%	2.69%	+3.03%

Volatility

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) have volatilities of 6.62% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KQQQ	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.62%	6.41%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.80%	14.11%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.21%	16.68%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.60%	18.06%	+5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.60%	18.06%	+5.54%

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

KQQQ vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.88%, more than GPIQ's 10.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	10.15%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	15.88%	12.01%	2.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KQQQ and GPIQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, KQQQ and GPIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KQQQ or GPIQ?

KQQQ has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to GPIQ (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KQQQ dropped -26.15% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, KQQQ or GPIQ?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 25.84% vs 25.10% for KQQQ. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KQQQ or GPIQ?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 25.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KQQQ or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for KQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KQQQ or GPIQ?

KQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 15.88%, compared with 10.15% for GPIQ.

What is the main difference between KQQQ and GPIQ?

KQQQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KQQQ and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.