KQQQ vs. ASMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH).

KQQQ and ASMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KQQQ is an actively managed fund by Kurv. It was launched on Jul 22, 2024. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

KQQQ vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KQQQ vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	-10.02%	38.52%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	25.77%	58.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KQQQ achieves a -10.02% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 25.77% return.

KQQQ

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -4.66%
• YTD: -10.02%
• 6M: -9.48%
• 1Y: 20.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 25.77%
• 6M: 39.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KQQQ vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

KQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

KQQQ

Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF

ASMH

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

KQQQ vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KQQQ

KQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 52
KQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
KQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
KQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
KQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KQQQ vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF (KQQQ) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KQQQ	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KQQQ	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	3.00	-2.58

Correlation

The correlation between KQQQ and ASMH is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KQQQ vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

KQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.93%, more than ASMH's 1.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
KQQQ Kurv Technology Titans Select ETF	16.93%	12.01%	2.48%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.29%	0.19%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KQQQ vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KQQQ drawdown since its inception was -26.15%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KQQQ and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	KQQQ	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.15%	-15.89%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.32%	-11.21%	-3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-4.43%	-0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KQQQ	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.45%	36.81%	-13.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.55%	36.81%	-13.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.55%	36.81%	-13.26%