KPHO vs. DBEM
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KPHO tracks the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index while DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DBEM.
Performance
KPHO vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 27.85% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBEM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 27.85%
- 6M
- 28.74%
- 1Y
- 51.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
KPHO vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -6.02% | 9.46% |
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 27.85% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and DBEM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank
KPHO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBEM
KPHO vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KPHO | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum DBEM drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and DBEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -33.51% | +19.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -5.26% | -5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -11.66% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility
KPHO vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | DBEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.87% | 20.69% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 17.70% | +10.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 17.38% | +10.49% |
KPHO vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.06%, more than DBEM's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF | 2.06% | 1.84% | 2.48% | 2.55% | 2.65% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 2.59% | 2.85% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 3.49% |
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 11.06% | 10.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and DBEM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBEM is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBEM is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.06%, compared with 2.06% for DBEM.
KPHO tracks Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.66% for DBEM.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and DBEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer