KPHO vs. DEM
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - KPHO tracks the Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index while DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
KPHO vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 18.12% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEM
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 18.12%
- 6M
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- 28.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
KPHO vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -5.51% | 9.46% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 18.12% | 0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and DEM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
KPHO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DEM
KPHO vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KPHO | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -51.85% | +37.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.73% | -2.71% | -8.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -12.87% | +6.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility
KPHO vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.96% | 14.33% | +13.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.96% | 15.49% | +12.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.96% | 17.87% | +10.09% |
KPHO vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.00%, more than DEM's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 3.82% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 11.00% | 10.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and DEM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.00%, compared with 3.82% for DEM.
KPHO tracks Dragon Capital Merqube Vietnam Growth Index, while DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.63% for DEM.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer