KPHO vs. EMOP
KPHO (KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. KPHO is passively managed, while EMOP is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KPHO charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.
Performance
KPHO vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -6.83% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 32.56% return.
KPHO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -6.83%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMOP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 32.56%
- 6M
- 34.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KPHO vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | -6.83% | 9.78% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 32.56% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between KPHO and EMOP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KPHO vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KPHO | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 2.93 | -2.77 |
Drawdowns
KPHO vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and EMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KPHO | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -12.88% | -1.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.98% | -0.72% | -11.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -1.90% | -3.93% |
Volatility
KPHO vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KPHO | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.80% | 19.85% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 19.85% | +8.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 19.85% | +8.95% |
KPHO vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
KPHO vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison
KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, more than EMOP's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.82% | 0.27% |
KPHO KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF | 11.16% | 10.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KPHO and EMOP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMOP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMOP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.
KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.16%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.70% for EMOP.
Find the right allocation for KPHO and EMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer