PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KPHO vs. EMOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KPHO vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KPHO achieves a -6.83% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 32.56% return.


KPHO

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
-6.83%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMOP

1D
-0.72%
1M
8.86%
YTD
32.56%
6M
34.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KPHO vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KPHO and EMOP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KPHO vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF (KPHO) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KPHO vs. EMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KPHOEMOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

2.93

-2.77

Drawdowns

KPHO vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KPHO drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KPHO and EMOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KPHOEMOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-12.88%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.98%

-0.72%

-11.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-1.90%

-3.93%

Volatility

KPHO vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KPHOEMOPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.80%

19.85%

+8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.80%

19.85%

+8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.80%

19.85%

+8.95%

KPHO vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KPHO has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

KPHO vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

KPHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.16%, more than EMOP's 0.82% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KPHO and EMOP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMOP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMOP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for KPHO.

KPHO has the higher dividend yield at 11.16%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for KPHO and 0.70% for EMOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KPHO and EMOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer