PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KOMP vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KOMP vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 13.75% return.


KOMP

1D
-2.06%
1M
11.27%
YTD
23.59%
6M
21.48%
1Y
46.75%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOMP vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
23.59%19.74%10.05%20.09%-32.21%3.67%61.28%37.12%-10.32%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and SPYG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.78

The correlation between KOMP and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

KOMP vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KOMP
SPYG

Technology

33.0%
51.9%

Industrials

28.2%
5.0%

Healthcare

11.6%
5.8%

Financial Services

5.8%
8.5%

Communication Services

5.6%
16.8%

Utilities

5.2%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
8.9%

Basic Materials

2.9%
0.3%

Energy

2.8%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
1.0%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

KOMP
33.0%
SPYG
51.9%

Industrials

KOMP
28.2%
SPYG
5.0%

Healthcare

KOMP
11.6%
SPYG
5.8%

Financial Services

KOMP
5.8%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

KOMP
5.6%
SPYG
16.8%

Utilities

KOMP
5.2%
SPYG
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

KOMP
4.7%
SPYG
8.9%

Basic Materials

KOMP
2.9%
SPYG
0.3%

Energy

KOMP
2.8%
SPYG
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

KOMP
0.2%
SPYG
1.0%

Real Estate

KOMP

-

SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KOMP vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP
KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KOMPSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.48

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

10.25

-0.39

KOMP vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KOMPSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.12

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.76

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.35

+0.17

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KOMPSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-67.63%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-13.76%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-22.14%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.38%

-32.67%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-1.13%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.69%

-24.33%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

3.32%

+1.43%

Volatility

KOMP vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.35%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KOMPSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

4.35%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.95%

12.46%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.15%

16.06%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

21.17%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.02%

20.64%

+6.38%

KOMP vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

KOMP vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KOMP
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
1.43%1.84%1.04%1.27%1.47%1.44%0.69%0.81%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


KOMP and SPYG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KOMP has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to SPYG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOMP dropped -50.06% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 16.07% vs 3.36% for KOMP. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 16.07% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for KOMP.

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

KOMP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for KOMP and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KOMP and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer