KNSL vs. ROM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

KNSL (Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.) is a stock, while ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%). Over the past 5 years, KNSL returned 14.09%/yr vs 25.38%/yr for ROM. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KNSL vs. ROM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (KNSL) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNSL achieves a -20.52% return, which is significantly lower than ROM's 52.28% return.

KNSL

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: -20.52%
• 6M: -21.63%
• 1Y: -34.96%
• 3Y*: -4.51%
• 5Y*: 14.09%
• 10Y*: —

ROM

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 52.28%
• 6M: 47.00%
• 1Y: 97.67%
• 3Y*: 50.35%
• 5Y*: 25.38%
• 10Y*: 41.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNSL vs. ROM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KNSL Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.	-20.52%	-15.78%	39.06%	28.27%	10.17%	19.16%	97.28%	83.67%	24.09%	33.20%
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	52.28%	35.63%	31.65%	130.70%	-63.86%	77.75%	80.42%	102.10%	-9.89%	81.11%

Correlation

The correlation between KNSL and ROM is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016	0.26

The correlation between KNSL and ROM shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

KNSL vs. ROM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNSL

KNSL Risk / Return Rank: 6
KNSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KNSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
KNSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8
KNSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KNSL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ROM

ROM Risk / Return Rank: 63
ROM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ROM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ROM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ROM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ROM Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNSL vs. ROM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (KNSL) and ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KNSL	ROM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.08	2.09	-3.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.52	2.43	-3.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.33	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	3.04	-3.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.56	8.86	-10.42

KNSL vs. ROM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNSL Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the ROM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNSL and ROM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KNSL vs. ROM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNSL drawdown since its inception was -46.83%, smaller than the maximum ROM drawdown of -83.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNSL and ROM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNSL	ROM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.83%	-83.36%	+36.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.63%	-32.33%	-8.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.83%	-48.10%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.83%	-67.55%	+20.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-67.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.13%	-16.04%	-27.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.02%	-20.85%	+8.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.50%	11.06%	+11.44%

Volatility

KNSL vs. ROM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. (KNSL) is 9.57%, while ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a volatility of 25.39%. This indicates that KNSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNSL	ROM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.57%	25.39%	-15.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.44%	39.45%	-16.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.54%	47.09%	-14.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.52%	52.53%	-14.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.19%	50.22%	-12.03%

Dividends

KNSL vs. ROM - Dividend Comparison

KNSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than ROM's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KNSL Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.	0.27%	0.17%	0.13%	0.17%	0.20%	0.18%	0.18%	0.31%	0.50%	0.53%	0.29%	0.00%
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology	0.16%	0.24%	0.21%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.05%	0.16%	0.30%	0.08%	0.20%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KNSL and ROM in my portfolio?

KNSL and ROM have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KNSL or ROM?

ROM has higher volatility (25.39%) compared to KNSL (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNSL dropped -46.83% vs ROM's -83.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.