PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNG vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNG vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNG achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return.


KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNG vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between KNG and VYM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.89

The correlation between KNG and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KNG vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNG
VYM

Consumer Defensive

23.5%
8.1%

Industrials

20.3%
12.1%

Financial Services

12.7%
20.5%

Basic Materials

10.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

10.1%
12.2%

Utilities

6.1%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
6.7%

Real Estate

4.4%
0.0%

Technology

4.3%
17.7%

Energy

3.0%
9.8%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

KNG
23.5%
VYM
8.1%

Industrials

KNG
20.3%
VYM
12.1%

Financial Services

KNG
12.7%
VYM
20.5%

Basic Materials

KNG
10.2%
VYM
3.5%

Healthcare

KNG
10.1%
VYM
12.2%

Utilities

KNG
6.1%
VYM
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

KNG
5.5%
VYM
6.7%

Real Estate

KNG
4.4%
VYM
0.0%

Technology

KNG
4.3%
VYM
17.7%

Energy

KNG
3.0%
VYM
9.8%

Communication Services

KNG

-

VYM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNG vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNG vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNGVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

3.93

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

14.76

-12.51

KNG vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNG and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNGVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

2.56

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.83

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.51

-0.02

Drawdowns

KNG vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-56.98%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-6.69%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-14.46%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

-15.84%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-0.43%

-5.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-7.19%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

1.78%

+1.54%

Volatility

KNG vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) is 2.29%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that KNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

2.77%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

7.67%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

10.28%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

13.96%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.34%

+0.84%

KNG vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNG vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNG and VYM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNG dropped -35.12% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 5-year performance, VYM leads with 11.48% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.

KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KNG and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNG and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer