PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLI vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLI vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -42.98% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -55.34% return.


KMLI

1D
-0.51%
1M
-22.77%
YTD
-42.98%
6M
-50.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
12.78%
1M
23.20%
YTD
-55.34%
6M
-70.69%
1Y
-21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KMLI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
-42.98%-37.98%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-55.34%69.11%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and HOOG is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLI vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KMLI vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMLIHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.83

0.41

-1.24

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, smaller than the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLIHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.23%

-86.94%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.65%

-79.17%

+8.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-37.70%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.46%

Volatility

KMLI vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLIHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.26%

137.25%

-57.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.26%

145.07%

-65.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.26%

145.07%

-65.81%

KMLI vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLI vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.64%, less than HOOG's 27.55% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMLI and HOOG have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 18.64% for KMLI.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 0.75% for HOOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLI and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer