PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLI vs. BNDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLI vs. BNDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -44.90% return, which is significantly lower than BNDD's 7.62% return.


KMLI

1D
-5.19%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
-44.90%
6M
-44.26%
1Y
-70.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDD

1D
0.42%
1M
3.77%
YTD
7.62%
6M
5.99%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
-3.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. BNDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KMLI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
-44.90%-38.14%
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
7.62%-1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and BNDD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLI vs. BNDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI
KMLI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
KMLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDD
BNDD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BNDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. BNDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMLIBNDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.09

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

0.84

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

1.81

-3.27

KMLI vs. BNDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLI Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the BNDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLI and BNDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. BNDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, which is greater than BNDD's maximum drawdown of -30.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and BNDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLIBNDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.23%

-30.87%

-42.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.23%

-6.09%

-67.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.64%

-24.18%

-47.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-19.39%

-23.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.16%

2.82%

+45.34%

Volatility

KMLI vs. BNDD - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) has a higher volatility of 21.21% compared to Quadratic Deflation ETF (BNDD) at 2.66%. This indicates that KMLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLIBNDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.21%

2.66%

+18.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.96%

8.29%

+53.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.30%

10.50%

+68.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.90%

13.34%

+65.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.90%

13.34%

+65.56%

KMLI vs. BNDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDD's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLI vs. BNDD - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.29%, more than BNDD's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BNDD
Quadratic Deflation ETF
3.50%3.82%3.85%4.30%43.17%1.04%
KMLI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
19.29%10.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KMLI and BNDD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMLI has higher volatility (21.21%) compared to BNDD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLI dropped -73.23% vs BNDD's -30.87%.

On 1-year performance, BNDD leads with 5.11% vs -70.09% for KMLI. On fees, BNDD is cheaper at 1.02% per year. On volatility, BNDD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNDD has performed better with a 5.11% return vs -70.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDD is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 19.29%, compared with 3.50% for BNDD.

KMLI is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BNDD is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 1.02% for BNDD.

BNDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLI and BNDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer