PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLI vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -40.20% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.80% return.


KMLI

1D
-6.84%
1M
-21.74%
YTD
-40.20%
6M
-46.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.01%
1M
1.59%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.86%
1Y
15.98%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KMLI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
-40.20%-37.98%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.80%12.21%

Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and XDSQ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.40

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KMLI
XDSQ

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KMLI
100.0%
XDSQ
10.2%

Basic Materials

KMLI

-

XDSQ
1.8%

Communication Services

KMLI

-

XDSQ
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

KMLI

-

XDSQ
4.9%

Energy

KMLI

-

XDSQ
3.5%

Financial Services

KMLI

-

XDSQ
11.6%

Healthcare

KMLI

-

XDSQ
8.5%

Industrials

KMLI

-

XDSQ
8.3%

Real Estate

KMLI

-

XDSQ
1.9%

Technology

KMLI

-

XDSQ
35.7%

Utilities

KMLI

-

XDSQ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLI vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KMLIXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.81

0.69

-1.50

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLIXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.23%

-26.06%

-47.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.22%

0.00%

-69.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.78%

-4.96%

-35.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLIXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.48%

10.56%

+68.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.48%

15.27%

+64.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.48%

15.10%

+64.38%

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLI vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.77%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


KMLI and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 17.77%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLI and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer