KMB vs. MKC
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KMB in Household & Personal Products, MKC in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.95%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for MKC. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. MKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than MKC's -27.49% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed MKC with an annualized return of 0.95%, while MKC has yielded a comparatively higher 1.82% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -19.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
MKC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- -27.49%
- 6M
- -25.55%
- 1Y
- -33.55%
- 3Y*
- -16.44%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
KMB vs. MKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -27.49% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and MKC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.35 |
The correlation between KMB and MKC shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
MKC:
$13.19B
KMB:
$5.93
MKC:
$6.10
KMB:
17.26
MKC:
8.02
KMB:
2.98
MKC:
5.83
KMB:
2.06
MKC:
1.85
KMB:
18.98
MKC:
1.89
KMB:
$16.54B
MKC:
$7.11B
KMB:
$5.93B
MKC:
$2.70B
KMB:
$3.07B
MKC:
$1.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. MKC — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
MKC
KMB vs. MKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.85 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -1.69 | +0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. MKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum MKC drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and MKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -52.02% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -39.50% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -47.65% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -52.02% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -52.02% | +17.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -48.49% | +21.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -11.03% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 19.92% | -0.49% |
Volatility
KMB vs. MKC - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) at 6.12%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | MKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 6.12% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 23.28% | -6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 28.06% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 24.34% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 24.17% | -3.10% |
Dividends
KMB vs. MKC - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than MKC's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.80% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
Financials
KMB vs. MKC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and McCormick & Company, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. MKC - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
MKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 708.90M and revenue of 1.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.8%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
MKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported an operating income of 227.50M and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
MKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McCormick & Company, Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 1.87B, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and MKC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to MKC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs MKC's -52.02%.
KMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.77 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and MKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer