KMB vs. GEV
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and GEV (GE Vernova Inc.) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while GEV operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past year, KMB returned -19.86% vs 93.31% for GEV. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
KMB vs. GEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than GEV's 44.12% return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -19.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
GEV
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -11.47%
- YTD
- 44.12%
- 6M
- 40.23%
- 1Y
- 93.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMB vs. GEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 6.67% |
GEV GE Vernova Inc. | 44.12% | 99.02% | 186.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and GEV is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | -0.08 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
GEV:
$255.86B
KMB:
$5.93
GEV:
$34.12
KMB:
17.26
GEV:
27.57
KMB:
2.98
GEV:
0.13
KMB:
2.06
GEV:
6.56
KMB:
18.98
GEV:
18.38
KMB:
$16.54B
GEV:
$39.38B
KMB:
$5.93B
GEV:
$7.85B
KMB:
$3.07B
GEV:
$3.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. GEV — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
GEV
KMB vs. GEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and GE Vernova Inc. (GEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | GEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.33 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.82 | -4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 11.27 | -12.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. GEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, roughly equal to the maximum GEV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and GEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | GEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -38.29% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -24.57% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -18.17% | -8.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -6.99% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 8.31% | +11.12% |
Volatility
KMB vs. GEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.42%, while GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) has a volatility of 13.17%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | GEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 13.17% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 34.45% | -17.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 49.09% | -23.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 53.62% | -33.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 53.62% | -32.55% |
Dividends
KMB vs. GEV - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than GEV's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEV GE Vernova Inc. | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. GEV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and GE Vernova Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. GEV - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
GEV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 9.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
GEV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
GEV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a net income of 4.75B and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in a net margin of 50.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and GEV have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEV has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs GEV's -38.29%.
GEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and GEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer