GEV vs. VRT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).

Performance

GEV vs. VRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GEV vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GEV GE Vernova Inc.	33.74%	99.02%	150.80%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	54.71%	42.80%	40.36%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GEV : $240.92B VRT : $98.15B
EPS GEV : $17.72 VRT : $3.41
PE Ratio GEV : 49.27 VRT : 73.44
PEG Ratio GEV : 0.23 VRT : 0.32
PS Ratio GEV : 6.32 VRT : 13.32
PB Ratio GEV : 21.55 VRT : 24.90
Total Revenue (TTM) GEV : $38.07B VRT : $7.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) GEV : $7.54B VRT : $736.40M
EBITDA (TTM) GEV : $3.68B VRT : $2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEV achieves a 33.74% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 54.71% return.

GEV

• 1D: 6.80%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 33.74%
• 6M: 42.21%
• 1Y: 186.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRT

• 1D: 6.98%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 54.71%
• 6M: 66.20%
• 1Y: 247.49%
• 3Y*: 159.97%
• 5Y*: 64.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GEV vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEV

GEV Risk / Return Rank: 97
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 98

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 98
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEV vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GEV	VRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.67	3.97	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.91	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.52	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.54	9.60	+0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.39	27.88	-1.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GEV vs. VRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEV Sharpe Ratio is 3.67, which is comparable to the VRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEV and VRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GEV	VRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.67	3.97	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.99	0.97	+2.02

Correlation

The correlation between GEV and VRT is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GEV vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison

GEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, more than VRT's 0.08% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GEV GE Vernova Inc.	0.20%	0.11%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.08%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Drawdowns

GEV vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum VRT drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEV and VRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEV	VRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.29%	-71.24%	+32.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.93%	-24.78%	+6.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-71.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-9.26%	+3.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.92%	-16.47%	+9.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.16%	8.53%	-1.37%

Volatility

GEV vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) is 15.71%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 20.14%. This indicates that GEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEV	VRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.71%	20.14%	-4.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.71%	45.36%	-8.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.18%	62.91%	-11.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.20%	61.08%	-7.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.20%	54.59%	-1.39%

Financials