GEV vs. SMNEY

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

GEV (GE Vernova Inc.) and SMNEY (Siemens Energy AG) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GEV vs. SMNEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Siemens Energy AG (SMNEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GEV

• 1D: 5.80%
• 1M: 6.37%
• YTD: 70.11%
• 6M: 68.89%
• 1Y: 128.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMNEY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEV vs. SMNEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GEV GE Vernova Inc.	70.11%	99.02%	186.24%
SMNEY Siemens Energy AG	25.32%	167.97%	196.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GEV and SMNEY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.47

Fundamentals

Market Cap GEV : $301.85B SMNEY : $152.45B
EPS GEV : $34.12 SMNEY : €2.16
PE Ratio GEV : 32.52 SMNEY : 81.35
PEG Ratio GEV : 0.15 SMNEY : 0.76
PS Ratio GEV : 7.74 SMNEY : 3.93
PB Ratio GEV : 21.68 SMNEY : 13.51
Total Revenue (TTM) GEV : $39.38B SMNEY : €39.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) GEV : $7.85B SMNEY : €7.27B
EBITDA (TTM) GEV : $3.32B SMNEY : €4.73B

Return for Risk

GEV vs. SMNEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEV

GEV Risk / Return Rank: 92
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SMNEY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEV vs. SMNEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Siemens Energy AG (SMNEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GEV	SMNEY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.12	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	GEV	SMNEY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.41%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.01%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GEV	SMNEY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.87%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.78%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.78%	—	—

Dividends

GEV vs. SMNEY - Dividend Comparison

GEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while SMNEY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GEV GE Vernova Inc.	0.18%	0.11%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%
SMNEY Siemens Energy AG	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.61%

Financials

GEV vs. SMNEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GE Vernova Inc. and Siemens Energy AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 9.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

SMNEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Siemens Energy AG reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 9.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.6%.

GEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

SMNEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Siemens Energy AG reported an operating income of 962.00M and revenue of 9.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

GEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a net income of 4.75B and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in a net margin of 50.8%.

SMNEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Siemens Energy AG reported a net income of 677.00M and revenue of 9.68B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEV and SMNEY in my portfolio?

GEV and SMNEY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.