KMB vs. BGS
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KMB in Household & Personal Products, BGS in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.95%/yr vs -14.86%/yr for BGS. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. BGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than BGS's -2.65% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has outperformed BGS with an annualized return of 0.95%, while BGS has yielded a comparatively lower -14.86% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
KMB vs. BGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and BGS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
BGS:
$323.22M
KMB:
$5.93
BGS:
-$0.96
KMB:
2.06
BGS:
0.18
KMB:
18.98
BGS:
0.80
KMB:
$16.54B
BGS:
$1.81B
KMB:
$5.93B
BGS:
$388.44M
KMB:
$3.07B
BGS:
$91.70M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. BGS — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
BGS
KMB vs. BGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.07 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.16 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 0.47 | -1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. BGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum BGS drawdown of -86.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and BGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -86.50% | +49.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -33.11% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -67.36% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -84.68% | +50.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -86.50% | +52.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -83.99% | +57.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -32.06% | +23.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 11.32% | +8.11% |
Volatility
KMB vs. BGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.42%, while B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a volatility of 9.65%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | BGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 9.65% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 33.85% | -17.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 51.42% | -25.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 49.32% | -29.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 46.31% | -25.24% |
Dividends
KMB vs. BGS - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, less than BGS's 18.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. BGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and B&G Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. BGS - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and BGS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGS has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs BGS's -86.50%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and BGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer