BGS vs. GIS
BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, BGS returned -15.60%/yr vs -2.44%/yr for GIS. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGS vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -12.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of -15.60%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher -2.44% annualized return.
BGS
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- 8.76%
- 3Y*
- -25.66%
- 5Y*
- -27.06%
- 10Y*
- -15.60%
GIS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 14.45%
- 6M
- -12.21%
- YTD
- -12.69%
- 1Y
- -17.93%
- 3Y*
- -15.76%
- 5Y*
- -4.77%
- 10Y*
- -2.44%
BGS vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -5.54% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -12.69% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and GIS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
BGS:
$310.06M
GIS:
$20.65B
BGS:
-$0.96
GIS:
-$0.16
BGS:
0.17
GIS:
1.14
BGS:
0.76
GIS:
2.82
BGS:
$1.81B
GIS:
$18.42B
BGS:
$388.44M
GIS:
$6.19B
BGS:
$91.70M
GIS:
$300.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGS vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
BGS
GIS
BGS vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGS | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.90 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.52 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | -1.02 | +1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGS vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGS | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -59.63% | -26.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.11% | -34.48% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.29% | -53.45% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -59.63% | -25.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | -59.63% | -26.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.46% | -50.60% | -33.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -10.37% | -21.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.15% | 17.69% | -3.54% |
Volatility
BGS vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) is 8.33%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 13.08%. This indicates that BGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGS | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | 13.08% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.98% | 21.66% | +12.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.27% | 26.30% | +23.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.41% | 21.89% | +27.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.35% | 22.41% | +23.94% |
Dividends
BGS vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.41%, more than GIS's 6.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 17.41% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.30% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
BGS vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGS and GIS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to BGS (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGS dropped -86.50% vs GIS's -59.63%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGS and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer