BGS vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGS or GIS.
Key characteristics
| BGS | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.85% | 9.23% |
| 1Y Return | -20.93% | -19.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -22.05% | 6.78% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.54% | 9.88% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -4.06% | 6.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.45 | -1.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 48.25% | 18.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -79.77% | -45.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -65.57% | -20.11% |
Fundamentals
| BGS | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $900.40M | $39.47B |
| EPS | -$0.89 | $4.36 |
| PE Ratio | 14.46 | 16.03 |
| PEG Ratio | 7.93 | 1.98 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.06B | $20.17B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $418.72M | $6.55B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $310.41M | $4.30B |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and GIS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGS vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of -4.06%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 6.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGS vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGS vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than GIS's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 6.70% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% | 4.55% | 3.63% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.38% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
BGS vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -79.77%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGS vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 5.75%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BGS vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities