PortfoliosLab logo
BGS vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BGS and GIS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BGS vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
52.36%
225.61%
BGS
GIS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BGS:

-0.71

GIS:

-0.91

Sortino Ratio

BGS:

-0.75

GIS:

-1.18

Omega Ratio

BGS:

0.89

GIS:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

BGS:

-0.47

GIS:

-0.56

Martin Ratio

BGS:

-1.23

GIS:

-1.50

Ulcer Index

BGS:

31.50%

GIS:

13.19%

Daily Std Dev

BGS:

55.10%

GIS:

21.76%

Max Drawdown

BGS:

-81.67%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

BGS:

-78.81%

GIS:

-35.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BGS:

$507.28M

GIS:

$31.07B

EPS

BGS:

-$3.18

GIS:

$4.55

PEG Ratio

BGS:

7.93

GIS:

3.61

PS Ratio

BGS:

0.26

GIS:

1.53

PB Ratio

BGS:

1.01

GIS:

3.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

BGS:

$1.46B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BGS:

$313.07M

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

BGS:

-$92.54M

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -5.72% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of -8.36%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.18% annualized return.


BGS

YTD

-5.72%

1M

-4.10%

6M

-24.28%

1Y

-37.35%

5Y*

-15.05%

10Y*

-8.36%

GIS

YTD

-12.65%

1M

-7.52%

6M

-18.46%

1Y

-17.98%

5Y*

1.83%

10Y*

3.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BGS vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BGS is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BGS is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BGS is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BGS is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BGS is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BGS is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BGS vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGS and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.71
-0.91
BGS
GIS

Dividends

BGS vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.04%, more than GIS's 4.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BGS
B&G Foods, Inc.
12.04%11.03%7.24%14.48%6.18%6.85%10.60%6.54%5.29%3.94%3.94%4.55%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.40%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

BGS vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-78.81%
-35.19%
BGS
GIS

Volatility

BGS vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 15.87% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 7.08%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.87%
7.08%
BGS
GIS

Financials

BGS vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
551.57M
4.84B
(BGS) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BGS vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between B&G Foods, Inc. and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
21.5%
33.9%
(BGS) Gross Margin
(GIS) Gross Margin
BGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 118.69M and revenue of 551.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

BGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -256.76M and revenue of 551.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -46.6%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

BGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -222.41M and revenue of 551.57M, resulting in a net margin of -40.3%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.