BGS vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGS or GIS.
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and GIS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGS vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BGS:
-0.57
GIS:
-0.16
BGS:
-0.50
GIS:
-0.09
BGS:
0.92
GIS:
0.99
BGS:
-0.38
GIS:
-0.09
BGS:
-1.14
GIS:
-0.32
BGS:
27.42%
GIS:
9.37%
BGS:
55.34%
GIS:
19.10%
BGS:
-81.67%
GIS:
-45.08%
BGS:
-80.33%
GIS:
-30.83%
Fundamentals
BGS:
$483.69M
GIS:
$32.82B
BGS:
-$0.32
GIS:
$4.55
BGS:
7.93
GIS:
3.31
BGS:
$1.38B
GIS:
$19.90B
BGS:
$299.34M
GIS:
$6.95B
BGS:
$139.29M
GIS:
$4.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than GIS's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of -8.67%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.48% annualized return.
BGS
-12.48%
-7.09%
-23.76%
-33.11%
-8.73%
-8.67%
GIS
-6.77%
-1.32%
-13.16%
-4.77%
5.30%
4.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGS vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BGS
GIS
BGS vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGS vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.60%, more than GIS's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 12.60% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% | 4.55% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 4.06% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
BGS vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGS vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.55%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BGS vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities