BGS vs. CAG
BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) and CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, BGS returned -15.60%/yr vs -5.50%/yr for CAG. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGS vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -12.61% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed CAG with an annualized return of -15.60%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively higher -5.50% annualized return.
BGS
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 1Y
- 8.76%
- 3Y*
- -25.66%
- 5Y*
- -27.06%
- 10Y*
- -15.60%
CAG
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- 6.71%
- 6M
- -12.91%
- YTD
- -12.61%
- 1Y
- -17.42%
- 3Y*
- -18.70%
- 5Y*
- -11.75%
- 10Y*
- -5.50%
BGS vs. CAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -5.54% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -12.61% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and CAG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
BGS:
$310.06M
CAG:
$6.93B
BGS:
-$0.96
CAG:
-$4.00
BGS:
0.17
CAG:
0.61
BGS:
0.76
CAG:
1.09
BGS:
$1.81B
CAG:
$11.28B
BGS:
$388.44M
CAG:
$2.70B
BGS:
$91.70M
CAG:
-$1.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGS vs. CAG — Risk / Return Rank
BGS
CAG
BGS vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGS | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.92 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | -0.49 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | -1.00 | +1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGS vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, which is greater than CAG's maximum drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and CAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGS | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -62.52% | -23.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.11% | -35.58% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.29% | -56.66% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -62.52% | -22.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | -62.52% | -23.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.46% | -56.89% | -27.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -15.85% | -16.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.15% | 17.52% | -3.37% |
Volatility
BGS vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) is 8.33%, while Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that BGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGS | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | 12.84% | -4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.98% | 24.32% | +9.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.27% | 29.77% | +20.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.41% | 23.86% | +25.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.35% | 26.48% | +19.87% |
Dividends
BGS vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.41%, more than CAG's 9.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 17.41% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 9.68% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
Financials
BGS vs. CAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. CAG - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 701.70M and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.63B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of -91.2%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of -1.62B and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of -56.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGS and CAG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (12.84%) compared to BGS (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGS dropped -86.50% vs CAG's -62.52%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGS and CAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer