BGS vs. CAG
Compare and contrast key facts about B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGS or CAG.
Key characteristics
BGS | CAG | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 9.85% | 9.70% |
1Y Return | -20.93% | -14.71% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -22.05% | -3.02% |
5Y Return (Ann) | -5.54% | 4.63% |
10Y Return (Ann) | -4.06% | 5.68% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.45 | -0.72 |
Daily Std Dev | 48.25% | 20.55% |
Max Drawdown | -79.77% | -56.94% |
Current Drawdown | -65.57% | -20.00% |
Fundamentals
BGS | CAG | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $900.40M | $14.62B |
EPS | -$0.89 | $1.99 |
PE Ratio | 14.46 | 15.37 |
PEG Ratio | 7.93 | 0.72 |
Revenue (TTM) | $2.06B | $12.12B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $418.72M | $2.86B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $310.41M | $2.24B |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and CAG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGS vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BGS having a 9.85% return and CAG slightly lower at 9.70%. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed CAG with an annualized return of -4.06%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively higher 5.68% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGS vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGS vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than CAG's 4.56% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B&G Foods, Inc. | 6.70% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% | 4.55% | 3.63% |
Conagra Brands, Inc. | 4.56% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% | 2.97% |
Drawdowns
BGS vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -79.77%, which is greater than CAG's maximum drawdown of -56.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and CAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGS vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) at 5.60%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BGS vs. CAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities