BGS vs. CAG
Compare and contrast key facts about B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGS or CAG.
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and CAG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGS vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BGS:
-0.71
CAG:
-0.85
BGS:
-0.75
CAG:
-1.07
BGS:
0.89
CAG:
0.87
BGS:
-0.47
CAG:
-0.56
BGS:
-1.23
CAG:
-1.47
BGS:
31.50%
CAG:
13.80%
BGS:
55.10%
CAG:
24.02%
BGS:
-81.67%
CAG:
-56.94%
BGS:
-78.81%
CAG:
-35.97%
Fundamentals
BGS:
$507.28M
CAG:
$11.39B
BGS:
-$3.18
CAG:
$0.68
BGS:
7.93
CAG:
0.33
BGS:
0.26
CAG:
0.97
BGS:
1.01
CAG:
1.30
BGS:
$1.46B
CAG:
$11.74B
BGS:
$313.07M
CAG:
$3.10B
BGS:
-$92.54M
CAG:
$1.22B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -5.72% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -13.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed CAG with an annualized return of -8.36%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively higher 1.03% annualized return.
BGS
-5.72%
-4.10%
-24.28%
-37.35%
-15.05%
-8.36%
CAG
-13.46%
-11.21%
-17.42%
-18.56%
-2.98%
1.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGS vs. CAG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BGS
CAG
BGS vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGS vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.04%, more than CAG's 6.00% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 12.04% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% | 4.55% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 6.00% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.49% | 3.99% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% |
Drawdowns
BGS vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, which is greater than CAG's maximum drawdown of -56.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and CAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGS vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 15.87% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) at 8.12%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BGS vs. CAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. CAG - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 118.69M and revenue of 551.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.5%.
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 710.30M and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.0%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -256.76M and revenue of 551.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -46.6%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 266.60M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -222.41M and revenue of 551.57M, resulting in a net margin of -40.3%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 145.10M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.