BGS vs. CAG
Compare and contrast key facts about B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGS or CAG.
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and CAG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGS vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BGS:
-0.57
CAG:
-0.13
BGS:
-0.50
CAG:
-0.03
BGS:
0.92
CAG:
1.00
BGS:
-0.38
CAG:
-0.08
BGS:
-1.14
CAG:
-0.27
BGS:
27.42%
CAG:
10.15%
BGS:
55.34%
CAG:
21.76%
BGS:
-81.67%
CAG:
-56.94%
BGS:
-80.33%
CAG:
-31.67%
Fundamentals
BGS:
$483.69M
CAG:
$12.07B
BGS:
-$0.32
CAG:
$1.04
BGS:
7.93
CAG:
4.83
BGS:
$1.38B
CAG:
$11.93B
BGS:
$299.34M
CAG:
$3.27B
BGS:
$139.29M
CAG:
$1.36B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than CAG's -7.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed CAG with an annualized return of -9.05%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively higher 2.83% annualized return.
BGS
-12.48%
-5.93%
-23.76%
-34.50%
-8.47%
-9.05%
CAG
-7.65%
0.46%
-14.74%
-2.33%
-1.30%
2.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGS vs. CAG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BGS
CAG
BGS vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGS vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.60%, more than CAG's 5.54% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 12.60% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% | 4.55% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 5.54% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.49% | 3.99% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% |
Drawdowns
BGS vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -81.67%, which is greater than CAG's maximum drawdown of -56.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and CAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGS vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) at 6.48%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BGS vs. CAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities