KLAC vs. HDV
KLAC (KLA Corporation) is a stock, while HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Over the past 10 years, KLAC returned 40.17%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for HDV. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KLAC vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 59.08% return, which is significantly higher than HDV's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed HDV with an annualized return of 40.17%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.
KLAC
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -17.36%
- 6M
- 47.87%
- YTD
- 59.08%
- 1Y
- 119.65%
- 3Y*
- 58.52%
- 5Y*
- 41.84%
- 10Y*
- 40.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 22.66%
HDV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 24.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.70M | $171.89M | $116.16M | |
KLAC KLA Corporation | $2.57B | $2.50B | $2.80B |
KLAC vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLAC KLA Corporation | 59.08% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -12.49% | 36.80% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 19.66% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAC and HDV is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.40 |
The correlation between KLAC and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAC vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
KLAC
HDV
KLAC vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLAC | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.71 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 12.85 | -2.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLAC vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAC | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.74% | -37.04% | -46.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.59% | -5.18% | -38.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.59% | -10.49% | -33.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.59% | -15.42% | -28.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.59% | -37.04% | -6.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.10% | -1.72% | -34.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -3.06% | -26.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.90% | 1.90% | +10.00% |
Volatility
KLAC vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 19.90% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 4.12%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLAC | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.90% | 4.12% | +15.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.34% | 8.54% | +40.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.67% | 10.80% | +48.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.19% | 12.94% | +33.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.27% | 15.78% | +27.49% |
Dividends
KLAC vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than HDV's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.08% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLAC and HDV have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLAC has higher volatility (19.90%) compared to HDV (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLAC dropped -83.74% vs HDV's -37.04%.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLAC and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer