KJD vs. CNXT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KJD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. KJD is actively managed, while CNXT is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNXT.

Performance

KJD vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJD achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 33.52% return.

KJD

• 1D: -4.75%
• 1M: -6.67%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: -6.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNXT

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 10.51%
• YTD: 33.52%
• 6M: 41.38%
• 1Y: 119.62%
• 3Y*: 26.28%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: 6.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJD vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	1.96%	-27.86%
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	33.52%	8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between KJD and CNXT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

KJD vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJD vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KJD	CNXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.62	0.22	-0.84

Drawdowns

KJD vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJD drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJD and CNXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJD	CNXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.17%	-68.98%	+19.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-48.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.90%	-2.15%	-29.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.63%	-42.94%	+14.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KJD	CNXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.90%	30.74%	+32.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.90%	35.27%	+27.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.90%	31.64%	+31.26%

KJD vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJD vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.13%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJD and CNXT in my portfolio?

KJD and CNXT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KJD or CNXT?

On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJD or CNXT?

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJD or CNXT?

CNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.

What is the main difference between KJD and CNXT?

KJD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CNXT is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.65% for CNXT.