KJD vs. CRMG

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KJD is a China Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while CRMG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

KJD vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJD achieves a -4.11% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -66.23% return.

KJD

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: -10.91%
• YTD: -4.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: -58.70%
• YTD: -66.23%
• 1Y: -68.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJD vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	-4.11%	-28.21%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-66.23%	16.58%

Correlation

The correlation between KJD and CRMG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.02

Return for Risk

KJD vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJD vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KJD	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.83	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.52	—

Drawdowns

KJD vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJD drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJD and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJD	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.81%	-79.83%	+29.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-75.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.96%	-75.29%	+39.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.31%	-40.83%	+10.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	44.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KJD	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	65.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.47%	77.67%	-16.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.47%	75.75%	-14.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.47%	75.75%	-14.28%

KJD vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJD vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJD nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJD and CRMG in my portfolio?

KJD and CRMG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KJD or CRMG?

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJD or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJD or CRMG?

KJD and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KJD and CRMG?

KJD is categorized as China Equities, while CRMG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.75% for CRMG.