KJD vs. ASHR

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - KJD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index. KJD is actively managed, while ASHR is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.

Performance

KJD vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJD achieves a -11.05% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 10.62% return.

KJD

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -29.05%
• YTD: -11.05%
• 6M: -11.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHR

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 12.37%
• 1Y: 39.26%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: -0.04%
• 10Y*: 5.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJD vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	-11.05%	-28.21%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	10.62%	4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between KJD and ASHR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

KJD vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KJD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 78
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJD vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KJD	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.26	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.11	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.40	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.10	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.83	—

Drawdowns

KJD vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJD drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, roughly equal to the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJD and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJD	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.17%	-51.30%	+2.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.59%	-15.24%	-25.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.98%	-29.13%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KJD	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.25%	17.37%	+43.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.25%	23.93%	+37.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.25%	24.07%	+37.18%

KJD vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJD vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	2.09%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJD and ASHR in my portfolio?

KJD and ASHR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KJD or ASHR?

On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJD or ASHR?

ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJD or ASHR?

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.

What is the main difference between KJD and ASHR?

KJD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ASHR is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.65% for ASHR.