KEP vs. BAM
KEP (Korea Electric Power Corporation) and BAM (Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.) are both stocks. KEP operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while BAM operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, KEP returned 19.54%/yr vs 18.09%/yr for BAM. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KEP vs. BAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEP achieves a -24.91% return, which is significantly lower than BAM's -8.96% return.
KEP
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -28.67%
- YTD
- -24.91%
- 1Y
- -5.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- -6.34%
BAM
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -13.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEP vs. BAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation | -24.91% | 147.56% | -4.05% | -16.09% | 7.73% |
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | -8.96% | -0.24% | 39.70% | 45.61% | -10.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEP and BAM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
KEP:
$15.91B
BAM:
$74.60B
KEP:
₩6.82K
BAM:
$1.55
KEP:
2.74
BAM:
30.11
KEP:
0.06
BAM:
0.05
KEP:
0.25
BAM:
14.94
KEP:
0.49
BAM:
6.73
KEP:
₩97.47T
BAM:
$5.08B
KEP:
₩16.07T
BAM:
$3.26B
KEP:
₩29.23T
BAM:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEP vs. BAM — Risk / Return Rank
KEP
BAM
KEP vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEP | BAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.94 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | -0.47 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | -0.80 | +0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEP vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEP drawdown since its inception was -78.55%, which is greater than BAM's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEP and BAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEP | BAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.55% | -30.37% | -48.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.84% | -30.37% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.84% | -30.37% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.17% | -23.33% | -28.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.53% | -9.16% | -35.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.28% | 17.99% | +6.29% |
Volatility
KEP vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison
Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) at 8.45%. This indicates that KEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEP | BAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | 8.45% | +6.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.94% | 22.90% | +16.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.53% | 29.97% | +18.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.42% | 30.12% | +8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 30.12% | +5.46% |
Dividends
KEP vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison
KEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than BAM's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. | 4.02% | 3.34% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation | 4.21% | 3.16% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.68% | 6.46% |
Financials
KEP vs. BAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Korea Electric Power Corporation and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEP vs. BAM - Profitability Comparison
KEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.68T and revenue of 25.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.
BAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported an operating income of 3.93T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
BAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
KEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a net income of 2.59T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
BAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. reported a net income of 617.00M and revenue of 1.34B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEP and BAM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEP has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to BAM (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEP dropped -78.55% vs BAM's -30.37%.
KEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.13 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEP and BAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer