PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEP vs. KB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KEP vs. KB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and KB Financial Group Inc. (KB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEP achieves a -27.21% return, which is significantly lower than KB's 20.33% return. Over the past 10 years, KEP has underperformed KB with an annualized return of -6.17%, while KB has yielded a comparatively higher 17.38% annualized return.


KEP

1D
-5.13%
1M
-8.25%
YTD
-27.21%
6M
-25.94%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
-6.17%

KB

1D
-3.14%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
20.33%
6M
20.88%
1Y
33.52%
3Y*
47.98%
5Y*
21.01%
10Y*
17.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEP vs. KB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KEP
Korea Electric Power Corporation
-27.21%147.56%-4.05%-16.09%-5.47%-25.51%3.72%-19.80%-16.71%-4.17%
KB
KB Financial Group Inc.
20.33%56.57%45.22%10.35%-11.26%22.62%-0.46%-1.45%-28.25%65.80%

Correlation

The correlation between KEP and KB is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2001

0.44

The correlation between KEP and KB shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEP:

$15.58B

KB:

$38.73B

EPS

KEP:

₩6.83K

KB:

₩16.37K

PE Ratio

KEP:

2.70

KB:

9.63

PEG Ratio

KEP:

0.06

KB:

1.07

PS Ratio

KEP:

0.24

KB:

1.34

PB Ratio

KEP:

0.48

KB:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEP:

₩97.47T

KB:

₩43.88T

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEP:

₩16.07T

KB:

₩22.91T

EBITDA (TTM)

KEP:

₩29.23T

KB:

₩9.39T

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEP vs. KB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEP
KEP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
KEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
KEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

KB
KB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
KB Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEP vs. KB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) and KB Financial Group Inc. (KB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KEPKBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.19

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

2.01

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

3.96

-3.08

KEP vs. KB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the KB Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEP and KB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KEP vs. KB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEP drawdown since its inception was -78.55%, smaller than the maximum KB drawdown of -84.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEP and KB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEPKBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.55%

-84.27%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.84%

-16.74%

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.84%

-34.41%

-14.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.84%

-42.89%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.55%

-66.92%

-11.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.64%

-12.42%

-41.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.51%

-40.10%

-4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.08%

8.48%

+13.60%

Volatility

KEP vs. KB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) is 13.33%, while KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) has a volatility of 14.43%. This indicates that KEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEPKBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

14.43%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.76%

27.20%

+11.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.01%

36.68%

+17.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.26%

33.72%

+4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.51%

32.84%

+2.67%

Dividends

KEP vs. KB - Dividend Comparison

KEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than KB's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KB
KB Financial Group Inc.
2.32%2.92%4.98%2.81%5.78%5.27%3.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.10%3.05%
KEP
Korea Electric Power Corporation
4.35%3.16%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.68%6.46%

Financials

KEP vs. KB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Korea Electric Power Corporation and KB Financial Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00T10.00T15.00T20.00T25.00T20222023202420252026
25.13T
2.71T
(KEP) Total Revenue
(KB) Total Revenue
Values in KRW except per share items

KEP vs. KB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Korea Electric Power Corporation and KB Financial Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
18.6%
100.0%
Portfolio components
KEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.68T and revenue of 25.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.

KB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.71T and revenue of 2.71T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

KEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported an operating income of 3.93T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

KB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported an operating income of 2.71T and revenue of 2.71T, resulting in an operating margin of 100.0%.

KEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a net income of 2.59T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.

KB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KB Financial Group Inc. reported a net income of 1.97T and revenue of 2.71T, resulting in a net margin of 72.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KEP and KB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KB has higher volatility (14.43%) compared to KEP (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEP dropped -78.55% vs KB's -84.27%.

KB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEP and KB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer