PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KEMX vs. KBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KEMX vs. KBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


KEMX

1D
-6.93%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
30.77%
6M
35.35%
1Y
62.85%
3Y*
25.88%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*

KBND

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMX vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
30.77%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.89%3.13%-6.81%4.41%9.38%-2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between KEMX and KBND is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KEMX vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

KBND
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMX vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KEMXKBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.19

KEMX vs. KBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KEMXKBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

KEMX vs. KBND - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KEMXKBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

Volatility

KEMX vs. KBND - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KEMXKBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.09%

KEMX vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

KEMX vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison

KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBND
KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.40%2.20%2.51%6.97%2.27%3.47%4.98%0.00%0.04%1.16%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.51%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KEMX and KBND have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KBND.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.

KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KBND is International Government Bonds. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.50% for KBND.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KEMX and KBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer