KEMX vs. KBND
KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KBND is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KBND.
Performance
KEMX vs. KBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KEMX
- 1D
- -6.93%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 30.77%
- 6M
- 35.35%
- 1Y
- 62.85%
- 3Y*
- 25.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- —
KBND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 30.77% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 3.13% | -6.81% | 4.41% | 9.38% | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMX and KBND is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMX vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank
KEMX
KBND
KEMX vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KEMX | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KEMX | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | — | — |
Drawdowns
KEMX vs. KBND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMX | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.28% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | — | — |
Volatility
KEMX vs. KBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMX | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.55% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.09% | — | — |
KEMX vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KEMX vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison
KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 2.20% | 2.51% | 6.97% | 2.27% | 3.47% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.16% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.51% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMX and KBND have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KBND.
KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.
KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KBND is International Government Bonds. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.50% for KBND.
Find the right allocation for KEMX and KBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer