KEMX vs. SPY
KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KEMX returned 14.85%/yr vs 13.51%/yr for SPY. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KEMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
KEMX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEMX achieves a 46.93% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return.
KEMX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 11.91%
- YTD
- 46.93%
- 6M
- 49.88%
- 1Y
- 82.27%
- 3Y*
- 30.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
KEMX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 46.93% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 13.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEMX and SPY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between KEMX and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
KEMX vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KEMX
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
KEMX
SPY
Financial Services
KEMX
SPY
Industrials
KEMX
SPY
Basic Materials
KEMX
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
KEMX
SPY
Energy
KEMX
SPY
Communication Services
KEMX
SPY
Consumer Defensive
KEMX
SPY
Utilities
KEMX
SPY
Healthcare
KEMX
SPY
Real Estate
KEMX
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEMX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
KEMX
SPY
KEMX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEMX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.39 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.39 | 3.01 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.56 | 13.54 | +7.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEMX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEMX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMX and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEMX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -55.19% | +16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.36% | -8.88% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | -18.76% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -24.50% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.75% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | -9.04% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 1.97% | +2.05% |
Volatility
KEMX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.91% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that KEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEMX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.91% | 4.64% | +7.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.38% | 9.75% | +12.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.60% | 12.43% | +12.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 17.14% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 17.99% | +3.24% |
KEMX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
KEMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KEMX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
KEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.23% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KEMX and SPY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (11.91%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEMX dropped -38.80% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 14.85% vs 13.51% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 14.85% return vs 13.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
KEMX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for KEMX and 0.09% for SPY.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEMX and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer