KEMQ vs. ROAM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM).

KEMQ and ROAM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KEMQ is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. It was launched on Oct 11, 2017. ROAM is a passively managed fund by Hartford that tracks the performance of the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2015. Both KEMQ and ROAM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	-8.14%	56.28%	13.81%	0.77%	-38.09%	-27.31%	39.26%	28.26%	-25.52%	1.88%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	6.43%	32.08%	6.21%	21.28%	-14.78%	9.32%	2.24%	8.89%	-12.24%	4.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEMQ achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than ROAM's 6.43% return.

KEMQ

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: -10.71%
• YTD: -8.14%
• 6M: -9.56%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: 16.57%
• 5Y*: -6.00%
• 10Y*: —

ROAM

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: 6.43%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 36.19%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 7.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KEMQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ROAM's 0.44% expense ratio.

KEMQ

KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF

ROAM

Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF

Return for Risk

KEMQ vs. ROAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEMQ

KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 54
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

ROAM

ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 93
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) and Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEMQ	ROAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	2.24	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	2.93	-1.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.44	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	3.09	-1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.15	13.21	-9.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEMQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the ROAM Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEMQ and ROAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEMQ	ROAM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	2.24	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.65	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.29	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between KEMQ and ROAM is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Dividend Comparison

KEMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than ROAM's 2.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF	5.73%	5.27%	0.73%	0.29%	0.00%	0.28%	2.28%	1.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	2.98%	3.17%	4.15%	5.40%	5.23%	4.22%	3.04%	3.55%	2.54%	1.84%	1.89%	2.25%

Drawdowns

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEMQ drawdown since its inception was -70.72%, which is greater than ROAM's maximum drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEMQ and ROAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEMQ	ROAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.72%	-45.47%	-25.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.94%	-11.63%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.39%	-27.07%	-39.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.30%	-7.69%	-30.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.75%	-11.28%	-24.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.62%	2.72%	+3.90%

Volatility

KEMQ vs. ROAM - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) at 7.59%. This indicates that KEMQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEMQ	ROAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.98%	7.59%	+4.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.65%	11.01%	+8.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.20%	16.22%	+10.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.63%	15.03%	+16.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.54%	17.83%	+11.71%