KDVD vs. CSD
KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) and CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. KDVD is actively managed, while CSD is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KDVD charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CSD.
Performance
KDVD vs. CSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDVD achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly lower than CSD's 37.89% return.
KDVD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- YTD
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- 6M
- 25.88%
- YTD
- 37.89%
- 1Y
- 62.34%
- 3Y*
- 33.39%
- 5Y*
- 17.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
KDVD vs. CSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 13.76% | -0.07% |
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 37.89% | -1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDVD and CSD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDVD vs. CSD — Risk / Return Rank
KDVD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSD
KDVD vs. CSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) and Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KDVD | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KDVD vs. CSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDVD drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum CSD drawdown of -70.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDVD and CSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDVD | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -70.47% | +59.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -8.17% | +6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -14.17% | +11.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility
KDVD vs. CSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDVD | CSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 25.74% | -11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 23.63% | -9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 24.97% | -10.40% |
KDVD vs. CSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDVD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
KDVD vs. CSD - Dividend Comparison
KDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than CSD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.51% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.60% | 1.62% | 2.61% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 1.33% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDVD and CSD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.
KDVD has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.12% for CSD.
They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for KDVD and 0.65% for CSD.
Find the right allocation for KDVD and CSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer