KDVD vs. VFMO
KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KDVD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KDVD charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
KDVD vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDVD achieves a 14.03% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 25.32% return.
KDVD
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 25.32%
- 6M
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- 41.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- —
KDVD vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 14.03% | -0.07% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 25.32% | -1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDVD and VFMO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDVD vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
KDVD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VFMO
KDVD vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KDVD | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KDVD vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDVD drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDVD and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDVD | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -36.77% | +25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.72% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -7.72% | +4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility
KDVD vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDVD | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.88% | 22.32% | -7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 21.89% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 23.63% | -8.75% |
KDVD vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDVD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KDVD vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
KDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than VFMO's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 0.69% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.39% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDVD and VFMO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMO.
KDVD has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.39% for VFMO.
KDVD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for KDVD and 0.13% for VFMO.
Find the right allocation for KDVD and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer