KDVD vs. IMCB
KDVD (Keeley Dividend ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. KDVD is actively managed, while IMCB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. KDVD charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.
Performance
KDVD vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KDVD achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 19.07% return.
KDVD
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- YTD
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IMCB
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 19.07%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.44%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.07M | $3.70M | $3.21M | |
| $12.62K | $8.99K | $7.70K |
KDVD vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 17.18% | -0.07% |
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 19.07% | -0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between KDVD and IMCB is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KDVD vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank
KDVD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IMCB
KDVD vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KDVD | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KDVD vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KDVD drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KDVD and IMCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KDVD | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -58.80% | +47.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -7.68% | +5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
KDVD vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KDVD | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 13.05% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 17.57% | -3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 19.61% | -5.22% |
KDVD vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
KDVD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
KDVD vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison
KDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than IMCB's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.20% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
KDVD Keeley Dividend ETF | 1.30% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KDVD and IMCB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IMCB.
KDVD has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 1.20% for IMCB.
They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for KDVD and 0.04% for IMCB.
Find the right allocation for KDVD and IMCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer