KCOP vs. XOMO
KCOP (Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. KCOP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.
Performance
KCOP vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KCOP
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 14.96%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCOP vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 4.75% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCOP and XOMO is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2026 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCOP vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank
KCOP
XOMO
KCOP vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF (KCOP) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KCOP | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.39 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
KCOP vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCOP drawdown since its inception was -21.55%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCOP and XOMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCOP | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.55% | -18.90% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -9.89% | +6.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -7.21% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.88% | — |
Volatility
KCOP vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCOP | XOMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.13% | 20.07% | +22.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.13% | 18.95% | +23.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.13% | 18.95% | +23.18% |
KCOP vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCOP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCOP vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison
KCOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than XOMO's 34.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KCOP Kurv Copper & Mining Enhanced Income ETF | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.77% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCOP and XOMO have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KCOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KCOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 34.77%, compared with 3.54% for KCOP.
They also come from different issuers: Kurv and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for KCOP and 1.01% for XOMO.
Find the right allocation for KCOP and XOMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer