KCCA vs. TILL
KCCA (KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF) and TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. KCCA is passively managed, while TILL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, KCCA returned -2.39%/yr vs -6.12%/yr for TILL. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KCCA charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TILL.
Performance
KCCA vs. TILL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KCCA achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than TILL's 4.32% return.
KCCA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 11.42%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 16.63%
- 3Y*
- -2.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TILL
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- -2.51%
- 3Y*
- -6.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KCCA vs. TILL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCCA KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | -1.01% | -11.81% | -16.05% | 34.07% | -10.16% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.32% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between KCCA and TILL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.01 |
The correlation between KCCA and TILL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KCCA vs. TILL — Risk / Return Rank
KCCA
TILL
KCCA vs. TILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KCCA | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.98 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | -0.28 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | -0.46 | +2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KCCA | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | -0.20 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | -0.57 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
KCCA vs. TILL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KCCA drawdown since its inception was -40.88%, which is greater than TILL's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KCCA and TILL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KCCA | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.88% | -33.76% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.30% | -8.98% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.88% | -30.40% | -10.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.82% | -29.99% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.45% | -21.41% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.71% | 5.43% | +3.28% |
Volatility
KCCA vs. TILL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF (KCCA) is 3.26%, while Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that KCCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KCCA | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 5.15% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 10.26% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 12.70% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 14.73% | +9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 14.73% | +9.28% |
KCCA vs. TILL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KCCA has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than TILL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
KCCA vs. TILL - Dividend Comparison
KCCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than TILL's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCCA KraneShares California Carbon Allowance Strategy ETF | 2.90% | 2.87% | 30.58% | 3.12% | 0.24% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.76% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KCCA and TILL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TILL has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to KCCA (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KCCA dropped -40.88% vs TILL's -33.76%.
On 3-year performance, KCCA leads with -2.39% vs -6.12% for TILL. On fees, TILL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, KCCA has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KCCA has performed better with a -2.39% return vs -6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TILL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for KCCA.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 2.90% for KCCA.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.91% for KCCA and 0.89% for TILL.
KCCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KCCA and TILL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer