PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLIA vs. IGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLIA vs. IGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLIA achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than IGOV's -1.54% return.


FLIA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.78%
1Y
2.80%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*

IGOV

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
-1.54%
6M
-1.25%
1Y
-1.38%
3Y*
1.82%
5Y*
-4.29%
10Y*
-1.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLIA vs. IGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLIA
Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF
1.68%2.12%2.42%7.17%-7.68%-1.98%1.37%7.58%-2.32%
IGOV
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF
-1.54%9.96%-6.50%5.57%-22.07%-9.25%10.88%3.76%-1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FLIA and IGOV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2018

0.52

The correlation between FLIA and IGOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLIA vs. IGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLIA
FLIA Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FLIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IGOV
IGOV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLIA vs. IGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLIAIGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.98

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.24

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

-0.54

+4.16

FLIA vs. IGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLIA Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the IGOV Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIA and IGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLIA vs. IGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLIA drawdown since its inception was -11.24%, smaller than the maximum IGOV drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIA and IGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLIAIGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-35.88%

+24.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.04%

-5.70%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.77%

-10.65%

+7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.42%

-32.92%

+23.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-24.80%

+24.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-11.05%

+7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

2.56%

-1.78%

Volatility

FLIA vs. IGOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) is 0.64%, while iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) has a volatility of 2.28%. This indicates that FLIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLIAIGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

2.28%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

6.36%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32%

8.15%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

9.97%

-5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

8.61%

-3.91%

FLIA vs. IGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLIA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IGOV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLIA vs. IGOV - Dividend Comparison

FLIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than IGOV's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLIA
Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF
2.68%2.62%2.97%0.93%18.12%2.26%0.43%2.93%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGOV
iShares International Treasury Bond ETF
1.43%1.41%0.59%0.00%0.11%0.39%0.00%0.24%0.31%0.19%0.69%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLIA and IGOV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGOV has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to FLIA (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLIA dropped -11.24% vs IGOV's -35.88%.

On 5-year performance, FLIA leads with 1.01% vs -4.29% for IGOV. On fees, FLIA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FLIA has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLIA has performed better with a 1.01% return vs -4.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLIA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IGOV.

FLIA has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.43% for IGOV.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLIA and 0.35% for IGOV.

FLIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLIA and IGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer