FLIA vs. BWZ

In the year-to-date period, FLIA achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than BWZ's 8.56% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FLIA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BWZ's 0.35% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FLIA Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the BWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLIA and BWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FLIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than BWZ's 2.26% yield.

The maximum FLIA drawdown since its inception was -11.24%, smaller than the maximum BWZ drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLIA and BWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) is 1.58%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that FLIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.