KBDU vs. CNXT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

KBDU (KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF) and CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) are both China Equities funds. KBDU is actively managed, while CNXT is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KBDU charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CNXT.

Performance

KBDU vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBDU achieves a -39.04% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 18.94% return.

KBDU

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: -2.52%
• 6M: -52.02%
• YTD: -39.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNXT

• 1D: -4.09%
• 1M: -10.81%
• 6M: 10.95%
• YTD: 18.94%
• 1Y: 76.32%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 1.49%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBDU vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF	-39.04%	19.79%
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	18.94%	5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KBDU and CNXT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

KBDU vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBDU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 84
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBDU vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBDU	CNXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.63	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.98	—

Drawdowns

KBDU vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBDU drawdown since its inception was -64.77%, smaller than the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBDU and CNXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBDU	CNXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.77%	-68.98%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.58%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-48.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.22%	-16.58%	-42.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.76%	-42.58%	+8.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KBDU	CNXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.68%	34.75%	+67.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	102.68%	35.92%	+66.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	102.68%	32.02%	+70.66%

KBDU vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBDU has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBDU vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison

KBDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%
KBDU KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBDU and CNXT in my portfolio?

KBDU and CNXT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KBDU or CNXT?

On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBDU or CNXT?

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KBDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBDU or CNXT?

CNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for KBDU.

What is the main difference between KBDU and CNXT?

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KBDU and 0.65% for CNXT.