PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBDU vs. FMET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBDU vs. FMET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBDU achieves a -6.19% return, which is significantly lower than FMET's 11.06% return.


KBDU

1D
6.90%
1M
13.27%
YTD
-6.19%
6M
10.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMET

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.33%
YTD
11.06%
6M
10.77%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBDU vs. FMET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KBDU
KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF
-6.19%34.59%
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
11.06%5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between KBDU and FMET is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBDU vs. FMET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBDU

FMET
FMET Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMET Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMET Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBDU vs. FMET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF (KBDU) and Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KBDU vs. FMET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBDUFMETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.56

0.00

Drawdowns

KBDU vs. FMET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBDU drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than FMET's maximum drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBDU and FMET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBDUFMETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.14%

-29.22%

-29.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.26%

-0.36%

-36.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.63%

-7.47%

-21.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.63%

Volatility

KBDU vs. FMET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBDUFMETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.18%

19.45%

+82.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

102.18%

24.19%

+77.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.18%

24.19%

+77.99%

KBDU vs. FMET - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBDU has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FMET's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBDU vs. FMET - Dividend Comparison

KBDU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
0.50%0.81%0.44%0.40%0.18%
KBDU
KraneShares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KBDU and FMET have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FMET is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FMET is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KBDU.

FMET has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for KBDU.

KBDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FMET is Communications Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KBDU and 0.39% for FMET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBDU and FMET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer