PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBAB vs. XDSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -34.51% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.84% return.


KBAB

1D
-2.24%
1M
-11.65%
YTD
-34.51%
6M
-43.88%
1Y
-12.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDSQ

1D
0.04%
1M
1.36%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.73%
1Y
16.08%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KBAB
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-34.51%-7.77%
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
2.84%19.72%

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and XDSQ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

0.38

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBAB
XDSQ

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

KBAB
100.0%
XDSQ
10.2%

Basic Materials

KBAB

-

XDSQ
1.8%

Communication Services

KBAB

-

XDSQ
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

KBAB

-

XDSQ
4.9%

Energy

KBAB

-

XDSQ
3.5%

Financial Services

KBAB

-

XDSQ
11.6%

Healthcare

KBAB

-

XDSQ
8.5%

Industrials

KBAB

-

XDSQ
8.3%

Real Estate

KBAB

-

XDSQ
1.9%

Technology

KBAB

-

XDSQ
35.7%

Utilities

KBAB

-

XDSQ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBAB vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBAB
KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBABXDSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.32

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

1.68

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

8.02

-8.36

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBABXDSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

1.53

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.69

-1.06

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -65.23%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and XDSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBABXDSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.23%

-26.06%

-39.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.23%

-9.60%

-55.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.11%

0.00%

-63.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.47%

-4.96%

-32.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.68%

2.01%

+34.67%

Volatility

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) has a higher volatility of 28.64% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.53%. This indicates that KBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBABXDSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.64%

0.53%

+28.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.46%

8.39%

+49.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.67%

10.54%

+77.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.88%

15.27%

+75.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.88%

15.09%

+75.79%

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBAB vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 91.44%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBAB and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBAB has higher volatility (28.64%) compared to XDSQ (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -65.23% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

On 1-year performance, XDSQ leads with 16.08% vs -12.41% for KBAB. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 16.08% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 91.44%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.79% for XDSQ.

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBAB and XDSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer