KBAB vs. KPRO
KBAB (KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and KPRO (KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBAB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KPRO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by KraneShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KBAB returned -33.72% vs -3.65% for KPRO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KBAB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KPRO.
Performance
KBAB vs. KPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -54.33% return, which is significantly lower than KPRO's -6.09% return.
KBAB
- 1D
- -4.58%
- 1M
- -34.77%
- YTD
- -54.33%
- 6M
- -57.11%
- 1Y
- -33.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KPRO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 6M
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- -3.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBAB vs. KPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -54.33% | -6.56% |
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | -6.09% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between KBAB and KPRO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between KBAB and KPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KBAB vs. KPRO — Risk / Return Rank
KBAB
KPRO
KBAB vs. KPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KBAB | KPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.92 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.29 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -0.56 | -0.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KBAB vs. KPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -74.28%, which is greater than KPRO's maximum drawdown of -12.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and KPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KBAB | KPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.28% | -12.81% | -61.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.28% | -12.81% | -61.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.28% | -12.81% | -61.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -2.59% | -35.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.39% | 6.58% | +32.81% |
Volatility
KBAB vs. KPRO - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) has a higher volatility of 15.89% compared to KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) at 1.54%. This indicates that KBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KBAB | KPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.89% | 1.54% | +14.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.17% | 7.84% | +50.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.97% | 8.87% | +79.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.02% | 7.78% | +82.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.02% | 7.78% | +82.24% |
KBAB vs. KPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KPRO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KBAB vs. KPRO - Dividend Comparison
KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.13%, more than KPRO's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 131.13% | 59.88% | 0.00% |
KPRO KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF | 2.82% | 2.65% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KBAB and KPRO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KBAB has higher volatility (15.89%) compared to KPRO (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -74.28% vs KPRO's -12.81%.
On 1-year performance, KPRO leads with -3.65% vs -33.72% for KBAB. On fees, KPRO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KPRO has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KPRO has performed better with a -3.65% return vs -33.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KPRO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.
KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 131.13%, compared with 2.82% for KPRO.
KBAB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KPRO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.95% for KPRO.
KBAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KBAB and KPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer