PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBAB vs. BABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KBAB vs. BABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KBAB vs. BABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
KBAB
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-31.94%-7.77%
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-31.52%-6.97%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KBAB having a -31.94% return and BABX slightly higher at -31.52%.


KBAB

1D
5.59%
1M
-26.07%
YTD
-31.94%
6M
-57.04%
1Y
-31.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BABX

1D
5.70%
1M
-25.93%
YTD
-31.52%
6M
-56.68%
1Y
-30.71%
3Y*
-5.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KBAB vs. BABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BABX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KBAB vs. BABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBAB
KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBAB vs. BABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KBABBABXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.35

-0.33

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.07

0.09

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.01

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.49

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-0.98

-0.03

KBAB vs. BABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is comparable to the BABX Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and BABX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KBABBABXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

-0.33

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

-0.02

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and BABX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

KBAB vs. BABX - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.98%, while BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

KBAB vs. BABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum BABX drawdown of -70.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and BABX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KBABBABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-70.62%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.69%

-63.43%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.66%

-61.35%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.88%

-44.56%

+10.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.72%

31.47%

+0.25%

Volatility

KBAB vs. BABX - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) have volatilities of 25.39% and 25.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KBABBABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.39%

25.50%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.20%

58.87%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.59%

92.17%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.97%

82.96%

+9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.97%

82.96%

+9.01%