PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KBAB vs. KOID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KBAB vs. KOID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -54.33% return, which is significantly lower than KOID's 33.89% return.


KBAB

1D
-4.58%
1M
-34.77%
YTD
-54.33%
6M
-57.11%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KOID

1D
1.38%
1M
2.21%
YTD
33.89%
6M
37.46%
1Y
73.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBAB vs. KOID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and KOID is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.47

KBAB vs. KOID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KBAB
KOID

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
14.7%

Basic Materials

-

4.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

37.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

43.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

KBAB
100.0%
KOID
14.7%

Basic Materials

KBAB

-

KOID
4.9%

Communication Services

KBAB

-

KOID

-

Consumer Defensive

KBAB

-

KOID

-

Energy

KBAB

-

KOID

-

Financial Services

KBAB

-

KOID

-

Healthcare

KBAB

-

KOID

-

Industrials

KBAB

-

KOID
37.2%

Real Estate

KBAB

-

KOID

-

Technology

KBAB

-

KOID
43.1%

Utilities

KBAB

-

KOID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KBAB vs. KOID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBAB
KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

KOID
KOID Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
KOID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KOID Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
KOID Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KOID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
KOID Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBAB vs. KOID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KBABKOIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.46

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

4.03

-4.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

13.43

-14.29

KBAB vs. KOID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the KOID Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and KOID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. KOID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -74.28%, which is greater than KOID's maximum drawdown of -18.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and KOID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KBABKOIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.28%

-18.19%

-56.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.28%

-18.19%

-56.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.28%

-1.43%

-72.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.47%

-3.40%

-35.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.39%

5.45%

+33.94%

Volatility

KBAB vs. KOID - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) has a higher volatility of 15.89% compared to KraneShares Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF (KOID) at 10.14%. This indicates that KBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KOID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KBABKOIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.89%

10.14%

+5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.17%

20.18%

+37.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.97%

25.54%

+62.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.02%

25.25%

+64.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.02%

25.25%

+64.77%

KBAB vs. KOID - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KOID's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

KBAB vs. KOID - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.13%, more than KOID's 0.63% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


KBAB and KOID have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBAB has higher volatility (15.89%) compared to KOID (10.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -74.28% vs KOID's -18.19%.

On 1-year performance, KOID leads with 73.00% vs -33.72% for KBAB. On fees, KOID is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, KOID has been the lower-risk option at 10.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KOID has performed better with a 73.00% return vs -33.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KOID is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 131.13%, compared with 0.63% for KOID.

KBAB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KOID is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.69% for KOID.

KOID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KBAB and KOID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer