KBAB vs. TCHI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KBAB (KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and TCHI (iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBAB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while TCHI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries Select Capped Index - Benchmark TR Net. KBAB is actively managed, while TCHI is passively managed. Over the past year, KBAB returned -16.96% vs 15.84% for TCHI. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KBAB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TCHI.

Performance

KBAB vs. TCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -39.99% return, which is significantly lower than TCHI's -0.33% return.

KBAB

• 1D: 10.58%
• 1M: 57.00%
• 6M: -53.74%
• YTD: -39.99%
• 1Y: -16.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -34.14%

TCHI

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -6.51%
• 6M: -5.36%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 1Y: 15.84%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	$69.43K	$174.57K	$194.23K
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF	$326.05K	$362.33K	$397.19K

KBAB vs. TCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-39.99%	-6.56%
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF	-0.33%	11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and TCHI is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	0.65

The correlation between KBAB and TCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

KBAB vs. TCHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBAB	TCHI
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	16.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.4%
Energy	-	0.7%
Financial Services	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	10.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	52.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBAB vs. TCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBAB

KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 9
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 12
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8

TCHI

TCHI Risk / Return Rank: 23
TCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
TCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
TCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBAB vs. TCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBAB	TCHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.49	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	0.86	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.10	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	0.67	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	1.40	-1.87

KBAB vs. TCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the TCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and TCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. TCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -78.98%, which is greater than TCHI's maximum drawdown of -43.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and TCHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBAB	TCHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.98%	-43.96%	-35.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.98%	-20.73%	-58.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.20%	-12.79%	-53.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.21%	-20.97%	-20.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.15%	9.94%	+36.21%

Volatility

KBAB vs. TCHI - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) has a higher volatility of 27.65% compared to iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) at 11.44%. This indicates that KBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBAB	TCHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.65%	11.44%	+16.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.86%	21.41%	+36.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.35%	28.60%	+61.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.76%	34.93%	+55.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.76%	34.93%	+55.83%

KBAB vs. TCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBAB vs. TCHI - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 99.78%, more than TCHI's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	99.78%	59.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TCHI iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF	2.33%	2.44%	2.49%	4.28%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBAB and TCHI in my portfolio?

KBAB and TCHI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBAB or TCHI?

KBAB has higher volatility (27.65%) compared to TCHI (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -78.98% vs TCHI's -43.96%.

Which ETF is better, KBAB or TCHI?

On 1-year performance, TCHI leads with 15.84% vs -16.96% for KBAB. On fees, TCHI is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TCHI has been the lower-risk option at 11.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBAB or TCHI?

Over the 1-year period, TCHI has performed better with a 15.84% return vs -16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBAB or TCHI?

TCHI is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBAB or TCHI?

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 99.78%, compared with 2.33% for TCHI.

What is the main difference between KBAB and TCHI?

KBAB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TCHI is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.59% for TCHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.