KBAB vs. KWEB

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

KBAB (KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBAB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. KBAB is actively managed, while KWEB is passively managed. Over the past year, KBAB returned -15.86% vs -17.34% for KWEB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KBAB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

KBAB vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -48.67% return, which is significantly lower than KWEB's -22.53% return.

KBAB

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -3.08%
• 6M: -51.00%
• YTD: -48.67%
• 1Y: -15.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: -26.37%
• YTD: -22.53%
• 1Y: -17.34%
• 3Y*: 1.78%
• 5Y*: -12.79%
• 10Y*: -0.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KBAB vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-48.67%	-6.56%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-22.53%	-0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and KWEB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	0.81

The correlation between KBAB and KWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

KBAB vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBAB	KWEB
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	34.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	27.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.9%
Healthcare	-	5.9%
Industrials	-	4.2%
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Technology	-	19.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBAB vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KBAB

KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 9
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 11
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 7

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KBAB vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBAB	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	-0.65	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	-0.82	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.91	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	-0.43	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.38	-0.87	+0.50

KBAB vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -78.98%, roughly equal to the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBAB	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.98%	-80.92%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.98%	-41.62%	-37.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-41.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-68.90%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.09%	-69.49%	-1.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.95%	-35.50%	-4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.95%	20.45%	+22.50%

Volatility

KBAB vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) has a higher volatility of 27.84% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 7.74%. This indicates that KBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBAB	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.84%	7.74%	+20.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.20%	20.55%	+40.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.50%	27.54%	+62.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.17%	47.59%	+43.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.17%	40.00%	+51.17%

KBAB vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBAB vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 116.67%, more than KWEB's 7.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	116.67%	59.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.95%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBAB and KWEB in my portfolio?

KBAB and KWEB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBAB or KWEB?

KBAB has higher volatility (27.84%) compared to KWEB (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -78.98% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

Which ETF is better, KBAB or KWEB?

On 1-year performance, KBAB leads with -15.86% vs -17.34% for KWEB. On fees, KWEB is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KWEB has been the lower-risk option at 7.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBAB or KWEB?

Over the 1-year period, KBAB has performed better with a -15.86% return vs -17.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBAB or KWEB?

KWEB is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBAB or KWEB?

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 116.67%, compared with 7.95% for KWEB.

What is the main difference between KBAB and KWEB?

KBAB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.70% for KWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.