KBAB vs. KLIP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

KBAB (KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KBAB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while KLIP is a China Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, KBAB returned -16.96% vs -3.45% for KLIP. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KBAB charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.

Performance

KBAB vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KBAB achieves a -39.99% return, which is significantly lower than KLIP's -7.10% return.

KBAB

• 1D: 10.58%
• 1M: 57.00%
• 6M: -53.74%
• YTD: -39.99%
• 1Y: -16.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -34.14%

KLIP

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 6.50%
• 6M: -11.47%
• YTD: -7.10%
• 1Y: -3.45%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	$69.43K	$174.57K	$194.23K
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	$623.83K	$609.30K	$993.79K

KBAB vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	-39.99%	-6.56%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-7.10%	9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between KBAB and KLIP is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2025	0.74

The correlation between KBAB and KLIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

KBAB vs. KLIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KBAB	KLIP
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	34.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	45.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.0%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	2.0%
Healthcare	-	6.0%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Technology	-	4.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

KBAB vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KBAB

KBAB Risk / Return Rank: 9
KBAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
KBAB Omega Ratio Rank: 12
KBAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KBAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 7
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KBAB vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KBAB	KLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	-0.26	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	-0.25	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.97	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	-0.20	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	-0.46	-0.01

KBAB vs. KLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KBAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is comparable to the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KBAB and KLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KBAB vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KBAB drawdown since its inception was -78.98%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KBAB and KLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	KBAB	KLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.98%	-21.48%	-57.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.98%	-21.48%	-57.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.20%	-12.44%	-53.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.21%	-4.32%	-36.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.15%	9.19%	+36.96%

Volatility

KBAB vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (KBAB) has a higher volatility of 27.65% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 2.40%. This indicates that KBAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KBAB	KLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.65%	2.40%	+25.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.86%	13.02%	+44.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.35%	16.59%	+73.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.76%	17.99%	+72.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.76%	17.99%	+72.77%

KBAB vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

KBAB has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

KBAB vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

KBAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 99.78%, more than KLIP's 27.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KBAB KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF	99.78%	59.88%	0.00%	0.00%
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	27.63%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KBAB and KLIP in my portfolio?

KBAB and KLIP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KBAB or KLIP?

KBAB has higher volatility (27.65%) compared to KLIP (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KBAB dropped -78.98% vs KLIP's -21.48%.

Which ETF is better, KBAB or KLIP?

On 1-year performance, KLIP leads with -3.45% vs -16.96% for KBAB. On fees, KLIP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KLIP has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KBAB or KLIP?

Over the 1-year period, KLIP has performed better with a -3.45% return vs -16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KBAB or KLIP?

KLIP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KBAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KBAB or KLIP?

KBAB has the higher dividend yield at 99.78%, compared with 27.63% for KLIP.

What is the main difference between KBAB and KLIP?

KBAB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KLIP is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for KBAB and 0.95% for KLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.