PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KLIP vs. FXP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between KLIP and FXP is -0.86. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.9

Performance

KLIP vs. FXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
15.76%
-31.66%
KLIP
FXP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KLIP:

0.44

FXP:

-0.84

Sortino Ratio

KLIP:

0.75

FXP:

-1.17

Omega Ratio

KLIP:

1.10

FXP:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

KLIP:

0.81

FXP:

-0.57

Martin Ratio

KLIP:

1.70

FXP:

-1.35

Ulcer Index

KLIP:

4.56%

FXP:

41.87%

Daily Std Dev

KLIP:

17.48%

FXP:

67.67%

Max Drawdown

KLIP:

-10.39%

FXP:

-99.90%

Current Drawdown

KLIP:

-2.21%

FXP:

-99.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than FXP's -52.30% return.


KLIP

YTD

4.60%

1M

3.23%

6M

1.83%

1Y

4.87%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FXP

YTD

-52.30%

1M

-5.10%

6M

-37.91%

1Y

-53.65%

5Y*

-19.15%

10Y*

-19.94%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLIP vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KLIP and FXP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for KLIP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FXP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KLIP vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.44-0.84
The chart of Sortino ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.75-1.17
The chart of Omega ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.100.85
The chart of Calmar ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.81-0.78
The chart of Martin ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.70-1.35
KLIP
FXP

The current KLIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the FXP Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLIP and FXP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.44
-0.84
KLIP
FXP

Dividends

KLIP vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison

KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.18%, more than FXP's 3.30% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
56.18%61.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
3.30%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%

Drawdowns

KLIP vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -10.39%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and FXP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.21%
-62.63%
KLIP
FXP

Volatility

KLIP vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) is 5.62%, while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a volatility of 23.00%. This indicates that KLIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.62%
23.00%
KLIP
FXP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab