PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
KLIP vs. XPP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KLIP vs. XPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.29%
10.79%
KLIP
XPP

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -1.52% return, which is significantly lower than XPP's 35.77% return.


KLIP

YTD

-1.52%

1M

-2.98%

6M

-6.29%

1Y

-0.27%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

XPP

YTD

35.77%

1M

-11.58%

6M

10.10%

1Y

17.05%

5Y (annualized)

-20.13%

10Y (annualized)

-10.72%

Key characteristics


KLIPXPP
Sharpe Ratio-0.020.28
Sortino Ratio0.100.89
Omega Ratio1.011.11
Calmar Ratio-0.030.20
Martin Ratio-0.060.85
Ulcer Index4.41%21.27%
Daily Std Dev17.04%65.12%
Max Drawdown-10.39%-89.90%
Current Drawdown-7.93%-82.17%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KLIP vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KLIP and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
Expense ratio chart for KLIP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for XPP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between KLIP and XPP is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KLIP vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KLIP, currently valued at -0.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.020.26
The chart of Sortino ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.100.87
The chart of Omega ratio for KLIP, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.011.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for KLIP, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.030.27
The chart of Martin ratio for KLIP, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.060.80
KLIP
XPP

The current KLIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the XPP Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLIP and XPP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.02
0.26
KLIP
XPP

Dividends

KLIP vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison

KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.79%, more than XPP's 2.29% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
57.79%61.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XPP
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
2.29%2.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.81%1.47%

Drawdowns

KLIP vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -10.39%, smaller than the maximum XPP drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and XPP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.93%
-36.35%
KLIP
XPP

Volatility

KLIP vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) is 7.50%, while ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a volatility of 20.91%. This indicates that KLIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.50%
20.91%
KLIP
XPP