KARS vs. POW
KARS (KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KARS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Electric Vehicles Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. KARS is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KARS charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
KARS vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KARS achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
KARS
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -11.89%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- YTD
- -2.50%
- 1Y
- 30.33%
- 3Y*
- -2.66%
- 5Y*
- -6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KARS vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | -2.50% | -1.65% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between KARS and POW is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KARS vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
KARS
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KARS vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KARS | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KARS vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KARS drawdown since its inception was -64.85%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KARS and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KARS | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.85% | -18.37% | -46.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.57% | -18.37% | -22.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.40% | -4.33% | -24.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | — | — |
Volatility
KARS vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KARS | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.17% | 32.94% | -4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 32.94% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.41% | 32.94% | -3.53% |
KARS vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
KARS has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
KARS vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
KARS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KARS KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.78% | 0.88% | 1.13% | 6.73% | 0.14% | 1.85% | 1.38% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KARS and POW have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KARS is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KARS is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
KARS has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
KARS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for KARS and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for KARS and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer