KAP.L vs. RR.L
KAP.L (National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR) and RR.L (Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC) are both stocks. KAP.L operates in Uranium (Energy), while RR.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, KAP.L returned 24.29%/yr vs 62.35%/yr for RR.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
KAP.L is traded in USD, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAP.L achieves a 24.37% return, which is significantly higher than RR.L's 13.72% return.
KAP.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 24.37%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 76.27%
- 3Y*
- 43.77%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- —
RR.L
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 46.28%
- 3Y*
- 110.91%
- 5Y*
- 62.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.35%
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAP.L National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR | 24.37% | 56.56% | -1.41% | 55.12% | -17.73% | 114.56% | 48.37% | 1.25% | 13.42% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 13.72% | 120.24% | 86.56% | 238.53% | -32.26% | 9.45% | -51.10% | -13.17% | 0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between KAP.L and RR.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
KAP.L:
$17.79B
RR.L:
£109.90B
KAP.L:
KZT 2.07K
RR.L:
£0.99
KAP.L:
0.03
RR.L:
13.19
KAP.L:
0.00
RR.L:
0.03
KAP.L:
0.01
RR.L:
2.75
KAP.L:
0.01
RR.L:
40.32
KAP.L:
KZT 1.73T
RR.L:
£40.12B
KAP.L:
KZT 827.00B
RR.L:
£10.12B
KAP.L:
KZT 933.88B
RR.L:
£9.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAP.L vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank
KAP.L
RR.L
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KAP.L | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.31 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 6.56 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAP.L drawdown since its inception was -49.67%, smaller than the maximum RR.L drawdown of -92.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAP.L and RR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAP.L | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.67% | -92.32% | +42.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.44% | -19.98% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.99% | -23.51% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.67% | -64.03% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.90% | -3.49% | -20.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.95% | -36.66% | +21.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.73% | 7.04% | +1.69% |
Volatility
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L) is 10.50%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a volatility of 12.44%. This indicates that KAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KAP.L | RR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.50% | 12.44% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.79% | 32.55% | +5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.86% | 37.87% | +8.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.13% | 43.93% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.86% | 50.21% | -7.35% |
Dividends
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison
KAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than RR.L's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAP.L National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR | 3.56% | 4.43% | 7.27% | 4.26% | 6.44% | 3.69% | 5.14% | 6.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.73% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 0.54% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
Financials
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KAP.L vs. RR.L - Profitability Comparison
KAP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a gross profit of 50.17B and revenue of 154.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.5%.
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
KAP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported an operating income of 34.96B and revenue of 154.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
KAP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a net income of -7.88B and revenue of 154.22B, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KAP.L and RR.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for KAP.L and RR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer