KAP.L vs. CCO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO).
Performance
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAP.L National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR | 39.78% | 55.89% | -1.79% | 55.11% | -17.73% | 114.56% | 48.52% | 1.24% | 13.43% |
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 18.83% | 78.54% | 19.38% | 90.76% | 4.23% | 63.38% | 51.62% | -21.22% | -2.21% |
Different Trading Currencies
KAP.L is traded in USD, while CCO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CCO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
KAP.L:
$20.23B
CCO.TO:
CA$65.88B
KAP.L:
$2.66K
CCO.TO:
CA$1.35
KAP.L:
0.03
CCO.TO:
111.74
KAP.L:
0.00
CCO.TO:
0.93
KAP.L:
0.01
CCO.TO:
18.92
KAP.L:
0.01
CCO.TO:
9.54
KAP.L:
$1.88T
CCO.TO:
CA$3.48B
KAP.L:
$988.54B
CCO.TO:
CA$1.17B
KAP.L:
$1.11T
CCO.TO:
CA$842.73M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KAP.L achieves a 39.78% return, which is significantly higher than CCO.TO's 18.83% return.
KAP.L
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 39.78%
- 6M
- 46.34%
- 1Y
- 151.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.84%
- 5Y*
- 32.78%
- 10Y*
- —
CCO.TO
- 1D
- 5.79%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 164.72%
- 3Y*
- 61.09%
- 5Y*
- 44.93%
- 10Y*
- 25.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
KAP.L
CCO.TO
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KAP.L | CCO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.25 | 3.04 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.63 | 3.58 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.18 | 6.25 | +1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.32 | 16.66 | +7.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KAP.L | CCO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 3.04 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.91 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.33 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between KAP.L and CCO.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Dividend Comparison
KAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than CCO.TO's 0.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KAP.L National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR | 2.94% | 4.11% | 6.85% | 4.25% | 6.44% | 3.69% | 5.14% | 6.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.21% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.47% | 0.69% | 0.52% | 3.45% | 2.85% | 2.34% |
Drawdowns
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KAP.L drawdown since its inception was -49.67%, smaller than the maximum CCO.TO drawdown of -85.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KAP.L and CCO.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KAP.L | CCO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.67% | -83.63% | +33.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.34% | -24.86% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.67% | -39.52% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -16.72% | +7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.07% | -39.18% | +24.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 9.48% | -3.64% |
Volatility
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR (KAP.L) is 15.65%, while Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a volatility of 17.23%. This indicates that KAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KAP.L | CCO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.65% | 17.23% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.70% | 41.74% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.55% | 54.64% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.17% | 49.76% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.92% | 46.34% | -3.42% |
Financials
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KAP.L vs. CCO.TO - Profitability Comparison
KAP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a gross profit of 266.34B and revenue of 543.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.
CCO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 267.09M and revenue of 1.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.
KAP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported an operating income of 247.70B and revenue of 543.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.6%.
CCO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 163.69M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.
KAP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR reported a net income of 219.63B and revenue of 543.13B, resulting in a net margin of 40.4%.
CCO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 199.07M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.