JSML vs. SLYG
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JSML tracks the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index while SLYG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSML returned 12.84%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for SLYG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
JSML vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JSML having a 22.76% return and SLYG slightly higher at 23.22%. Over the past 10 years, JSML has outperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 12.84%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.10% annualized return.
JSML
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- YTD
- 22.76%
- 1Y
- 33.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- YTD
- 23.22%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.10%
JSML vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 22.76% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | 3.08% | 35.38% | 32.50% | -2.53% | 20.93% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 23.22% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and SLYG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between JSML and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSML vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
SLYG
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Healthcare
JSML
SLYG
Technology
JSML
SLYG
Industrials
JSML
SLYG
Financial Services
JSML
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
SLYG
Basic Materials
JSML
SLYG
Energy
JSML
SLYG
Real Estate
JSML
SLYG
Communication Services
JSML
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
JSML
SLYG
Utilities
JSML
-
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
SLYG
JSML vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSML | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.07 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.91 | 10.72 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSML vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -62.92% | +23.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -9.10% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -27.39% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -29.18% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | -41.86% | +2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -2.96% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -14.85% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 2.61% | +1.59% |
Volatility
JSML vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 4.36%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.75% | 4.36% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 13.02% | +4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 17.93% | +4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 21.55% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.26% | 22.71% | +1.55% |
JSML vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than SLYG's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.60% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.66% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSML and SLYG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSML has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to SLYG (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 10-year performance, JSML leads with 12.84% vs 11.10% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSML has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.60% for JSML.
JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.15% for SLYG.
SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer