JSML vs. IJT
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JSML tracks the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index while IJT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSML returned 12.46%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for IJT. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IJT.
Performance
JSML vs. IJT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 21.51% return, which is significantly lower than IJT's 24.93% return. Over the past 10 years, JSML has outperformed IJT with an annualized return of 12.46%, while IJT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.
JSML
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 15.94%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.47%
IJT
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.87M | $35.40M | $31.70M | |
| $2.12M | $2.84M | $2.20M |
JSML vs. IJT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 21.51% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | 3.08% | 35.38% | 32.50% | -2.53% | 20.93% |
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 24.93% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and IJT is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.86 |
The correlation between JSML and IJT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSML vs. IJT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
IJT
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
JSML
IJT
Healthcare
JSML
IJT
Industrials
JSML
IJT
Financial Services
JSML
IJT
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
IJT
Basic Materials
JSML
IJT
Consumer Defensive
JSML
IJT
Real Estate
JSML
IJT
Energy
JSML
IJT
Communication Services
JSML
IJT
Utilities
JSML
-
IJT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. IJT — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
IJT
JSML vs. IJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSML | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.85 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 13.03 | -5.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSML vs. IJT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum IJT drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and IJT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -57.61% | +17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -9.08% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -27.41% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -29.24% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | -42.03% | +2.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.47% | -1.56% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -10.25% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.68% | +1.70% |
Volatility
JSML vs. IJT - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) at 4.45%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 4.45% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 13.00% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.73% | 17.84% | +4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 21.50% | +3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 23.01% | +1.29% |
JSML vs. IJT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IJT's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. IJT - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than IJT's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.61% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSML and IJT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSML has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to IJT (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs IJT's -57.61%.
On 10-year performance, JSML leads with 12.46% vs 11.03% for IJT. On fees, IJT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSML has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.
IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.61% for JSML.
JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.18% for IJT.
IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and IJT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer